Samsung Ace 3 S7275R Specification
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 S7275R: A Retrospective: Samsung Ace 3 S7275r Specification
Samsung ace 3 s7275r specification – The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 S7275R, released in 2013, represented Samsung’s continued push into the budget-friendly smartphone market. This device aimed to provide a balance of functionality and affordability, targeting users seeking a reliable and accessible Android experience. This article delves into the specifications, features, user reception, and overall legacy of the Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 S7275R.
Device Overview, Samsung ace 3 s7275r specification
Source: phonegg.com
The Samsung Ace 3 S7275R, while a budget-friendly device, offered decent specifications for its time. Its camera, however, pales in comparison to the advancements seen in later models like the Samsung A9, which boasted a remarkable quad-camera setup. You can find detailed information on the Samsung A9 4 camera specification here: samsung a9 4 camera specification. Returning to the Ace 3, its overall performance and battery life were key selling points, despite its simpler camera technology.
The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 S7275R was a budget-oriented Android smartphone launched by Samsung in 2013. Its primary market positioning was as an affordable yet functional device for users who didn’t require flagship-level specifications. Key features that set it apart from competitors at the time included its relatively compact size, dual-SIM capability (in some regions), and its access to the then-current Android ecosystem.
| Feature | Specification | Comparison to Similar Devices | User Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | 1.2 GHz dual-core | Comparable to other budget phones of the era, slightly less powerful than mid-range offerings. | Adequate for basic tasks, but could struggle with demanding apps or multitasking. |
| Operating System | Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean) | Standard for budget Android phones at launch. | Provided access to a wide range of apps and services. |
| Display | 4.0-inch, WVGA (480 x 800 pixels) | Smaller and lower resolution than many competitors. | Sufficient for basic use, but lacked the sharpness and detail of higher-resolution screens. |
| Dual SIM | Yes (region-dependent) | A differentiating factor in markets where dual-SIM usage was prevalent. | Enhanced convenience for users needing two phone numbers. |
Technical Specifications
The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 S7275R’s internal components defined its performance capabilities and user experience. The choice of components reflects its budget-friendly nature.
| Component | Specification | Technological Significance | User Experience |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | 1.2 GHz dual-core | A common processor for budget smartphones in 2013; relatively low power consumption. | Sufficient for basic tasks, but could experience lag with more demanding apps. |
| RAM | 1 GB | Standard RAM for budget devices of the time. | Could lead to performance issues when running multiple apps simultaneously. |
| Internal Storage | 8 GB (expandable via microSD) | Expandable storage mitigated the limitations of the base storage. | Provided enough space for basic apps and media, with expansion for increased capacity. |
| Display | 4.0-inch WVGA (480 x 800 pixels) TFT | Common display technology for budget phones; offered acceptable viewing angles and brightness. | Viewing experience was adequate, but lacked the vibrancy and sharpness of higher-resolution displays. |
| Camera | 5 MP rear camera, VGA front camera | Basic camera specifications typical for budget smartphones at the time. | Image quality was acceptable in good lighting conditions, but struggled in low light. |
Software and User Interface
The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 S7275R originally shipped with Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean). This version of Android, while not the latest at the time of release, provided a solid foundation for the device’s functionality. The UI incorporated Samsung’s TouchWiz skin, which added some customizations and features.
| Aspect | Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean) with TouchWiz | Contemporary Android Versions | Key Differences |
|---|---|---|---|
| UI Design | Familiar Android layout with Samsung’s TouchWiz customizations. | More streamlined and minimalist designs in later versions. | TouchWiz was considered by some to be bloated and less efficient than stock Android. |
| Features | Standard Android features plus Samsung-specific apps and features. | Expanded features, improved multitasking, and enhanced security. | Significant feature gaps existed compared to later Android releases. |
| Performance | Performance was adequate for the hardware, but could be sluggish. | Optimized performance for smoother multitasking and app usage. | Performance improvements are significant in later versions. |
Connectivity and Features
The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 S7275R offered a standard set of connectivity options for its time. These features were typical for budget smartphones of the era, with some variations depending on the specific regional model.
- Wi-Fi: Allowed for wireless internet access. Pros: Convenient internet access at home or in Wi-Fi hotspots. Cons: Requires a Wi-Fi network connection.
- Bluetooth: Enabled wireless communication with other devices. Pros: Easy file sharing and connection to wireless peripherals. Cons: Limited range and potential security concerns.
- Mobile Data: Provided internet access on the go. Pros: Internet access anywhere with cellular service. Cons: Can be expensive depending on the data plan.
- GPS: Facilitated location services and navigation. Pros: Useful for navigation apps and location-based services. Cons: Can drain battery life.
- NFC (Near Field Communication): Present in some models, allowing for tap-to-pay and data exchange. Pros: Convenient for contactless payments and data transfer. Cons: Not universally supported by all devices or payment systems.
Battery Life and Performance
The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 S7275R’s battery life was a key consideration for users. While the battery capacity was modest for modern standards, its performance relative to its contemporaries is worth examining.
The device’s 1500mAh battery generally provided a full day of use under moderate usage conditions. However, heavy use, such as extensive gaming or video streaming, would significantly reduce battery life. Common user-reported issues included occasional battery drain and inconsistent performance. Compared to competing devices at the time, battery life was considered average for a budget smartphone.
The typical user experience involved moderate battery life, sufficient for daily use but requiring charging overnight. Users who heavily used data-intensive applications experienced shorter battery life.
Legacy and User Reception
The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 S7275R received mixed reviews upon release. While praised for its affordability and accessibility, its performance limitations and relatively basic specifications drew criticism. The device received a few software updates and security patches, but these were limited in scope and frequency.
- Positive reviews often highlighted its affordability and dual-SIM functionality.
- Negative reviews frequently mentioned performance limitations, especially under heavy load.
- Many users reported satisfaction with its basic functionality for everyday tasks.
- The limited software updates were a common point of concern among users.
Illustrative Description
Source: allegroimg.com
The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 S7275R presented a compact and understated design. Its plastic casing, while not premium, felt sturdy enough for everyday use. The device was comfortably held in one hand, thanks to its relatively small dimensions. The 4.0-inch display, while not high-resolution, offered adequate brightness and color reproduction for basic tasks. The overall feel was one of practicality and affordability; a phone designed for functionality over flashy aesthetics.
Imagine a sleek, dark grey rectangle, comfortable in your palm, offering a reliable entry point into the Android experience of its time.
FAQ
Was the Samsung Ace 3 S7275R upgradeable to a later Android version?
While it initially launched with a specific Android version, significant OS upgrades were limited. Users likely experienced only minor updates, focusing primarily on security patches rather than major version jumps.
How did the Samsung Ace 3 S7275R compare to other budget phones of its time?
Compared to other budget phones of its era, the Ace 3 S7275R generally offered competitive specifications for its price point, but direct comparisons require specifying the competing models. Its performance and features were generally in line with similar devices, offering a balance of affordability and functionality.
Are there any known hardware issues with the Samsung Ace 3 S7275R?
As with many older devices, some common issues reported by users include battery degradation over time and occasional software glitches. The extent of these issues varies depending on usage and device maintenance.